tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post6329899160662609775..comments2023-10-09T10:25:41.192-07:00Comments on Confessions from a Mormon Bachelor Pad: Proposition 8Mormon Bachelor Padhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04258772069893950671noreply@blogger.comBlogger107125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-9009715300780503062022-03-03T12:44:19.132-08:002022-03-03T12:44:19.132-08:00Harrah's Cherokee Casino & Hotel - Mapyro
...Harrah's Cherokee Casino & Hotel - Mapyro<br />Harrah's Cherokee Casino & Hotel is located <a href="https://www.mapyro.com/%ec%8b%9c%ed%9d%a5%ec%b6%9c%ec%9e%a5%ec%95%88%eb%a7%88.html/" rel="nofollow">시흥 출장마사지</a> in Murphy, North Carolina. <a href="https://drmcd.com/%ec%8b%9c%ed%9d%a5%ea%b0%80%ec%9e%a5-%ec%9d%b8%ea%b8%b0-%ec%9e%88%eb%8a%94%ec%b6%9c%ec%9e%a5%ec%95%88%eb%a7%88%ea%b0%80%ea%b2%8c.html/" rel="nofollow">시흥 출장마사지</a> The casino offers a full <a href="https://drmcd.com/%ec%a0%9c%ec%a3%bc%ec%b6%9c%ec%9e%a5%ec%95%88%eb%a7%88.html/" rel="nofollow">제주 출장마사지</a> casino and sportsbook. The hotel is 7.5 m from <a href="https://www.jtmhub.com/%ed%8f%ac%ec%b2%9c%ec%b5%9c%ea%b3%a0%ec%9d%98%ec%b6%9c%ec%9e%a5%eb%a7%88%ec%82%ac%ec%a7%80%eb%b0%9b%ec%95%84%eb%b3%b4%ec%84%b8%ec%9a%94.html/" rel="nofollow">포천 출장샵</a> the <a href="https://www.jtmhub.com/%ea%b2%bd%ec%82%b0%ec%b5%9c%ea%b3%a0%ec%9d%98%ec%b6%9c%ec%9e%a5%eb%a7%88%ec%82%ac%ec%a7%80%eb%b0%9b%ec%95%84%eb%b3%b4%ec%84%b8%ec%9a%94.html/" rel="nofollow">경산 출장안마</a> centre.langleeudyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08060144928019512316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-41372865480962918692011-08-30T22:24:41.350-07:002011-08-30T22:24:41.350-07:00"Are you honestly trying to tell me that at s..."Are you honestly trying to tell me that at some point in the future, God is going to allow two gay men to co-habitate in the Celestial Kingdom and create worlds together?"<br /><br />With the way your church revises its history, its scripture, and prophecy from past prophets, I don't think this is too far fetched to be quite honest. There might come a day where your church decides it needs to further modernize itself (as it has in the past).Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01744290740314255678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-55568529764552375582010-08-27T09:17:00.273-07:002010-08-27T09:17:00.273-07:00Amen. There are a couple interesting statements by...Amen. There are a couple interesting statements by Presidnet Hinckley about it. I blogged about them a while ago.<br />http://mattandfaroe.blogspot.com/2008/09/proposition-8_19.htmlAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15516753880076778340noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-17364237877576343642010-08-20T22:07:28.366-07:002010-08-20T22:07:28.366-07:00I love your post. It is very direct and convincin...I love your post. It is very direct and convincing. But I must warn you that bringing the word "sin" into a very opinionated subject will knock you off the ladder. I'm not disagreeing with your beliefs, in fact I used to be LDS myself; people need to discuss these subjects with an open mind. Just as you believe in god, atheist do not. So you cannot win an argument by telling someone they are sinning when they do what they want. Other than that, your argument was exceptionally well.so, now what?https://www.blogger.com/profile/14715146217295359332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-58946132769746166722010-08-19T10:41:39.533-07:002010-08-19T10:41:39.533-07:00Now this is what I've been looking for! Finall...Now this is what I've been looking for! Finally somebody that faithfully follows their church leaders, but doesn't do it blindly. This is both religiously and politically sound. Standing ovation.Totohirohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09950593960995284082noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-7408554929460396912010-08-18T15:58:17.249-07:002010-08-18T15:58:17.249-07:00From California, living in California, and I total...From California, living in California, and I totally agree with you. All we did was define marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. No one is being left out from the ability to get "married." Homosexual couples cannot by definition get married, they get "domestic partnershipped" (new word?).Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05129198587952629102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-36893954807582711232010-08-18T12:25:47.355-07:002010-08-18T12:25:47.355-07:00Yes finally the state of California is doing the r...Yes finally the state of California is doing the right thing. The country was set up to protect minorities from mob rule.<br />While there's no solid evidence on either side of the born or choose debate doesn't mean you can discriminate. <br />Schools aren't going to talk about butt sex. I'm pretty sure most parents have the option of not having the school talk to their kids about sex and doing that themselves. They should be doing that anyway.<br />a gay couple can't sue the church for not marrying them. BESIDES the point that why would a gay couple want a MORMON bishop who thinks they are going to hell to marry them anyway? <br />So it's your responsibility to stop one sin, gay marriage? what about Word of Wisdom sins? want prohibition again?<br />I don't get what your thing about polygamy is considering the church still practices polygamy and the scripture requiring polygamy for exhalation is still in the D and C. The only reason the church stopped it was to comply with the laws of the United States. And seriously? brother and sister? <br />Murdering has a bad effect on communities and society- it involves KILLING PEOPLE?!?!?! really? we equate loving and carrying and protecting relationships to MURDER?! And they already are "sinning" marriage won't change that.<br />It's not requesting additional rights, it's about pursuit of happiness- a so called "inalienable right" <br />Actually all studies done on the welfare of homosexual couple's children show that they do BETTER than children of heterosexual couples! <br />The church has changed it's mind multiple times on multiple issues, not just blacks and the priesthood.Natashahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03610308226422485914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-44164655783038278942010-08-18T12:25:22.625-07:002010-08-18T12:25:22.625-07:00Yes finally the state of California is doing the r...Yes finally the state of California is doing the right thing. The country was set up to protect minorities from mob rule.<br />While there's no solid evidence on either side of the born or choose debate doesn't mean you can discriminate. <br />Schools aren't going to talk about butt sex. I'm pretty sure most parents have the option of not having the school talk to their kids about sex and doing that themselves. They should be doing that anyway.<br />a gay couple can't sue the church for not marrying them. BESIDES the point that why would a gay couple want a MORMON bishop who thinks they are going to hell to marry them anyway? <br />So it's your responsibility to stop one sin, gay marriage? what about Word of Wisdom sins? want prohibition again?<br />I don't get what your thing about polygamy is considering the church still practices polygamy and the scripture requiring polygamy for exhalation is still in the D and C. The only reason the church stopped it was to comply with the laws of the United States. And seriously? brother and sister? <br />Murdering has a bad effect on communities and society- it involves KILLING PEOPLE?!?!?! really? we equate loving and carrying and protecting relationships to MURDER?! And they already are "sinning" marriage won't change that.<br />It's not requesting additional rights, it's about pursuit of happiness- a so called "inalienable right" <br />Actually all studies done on the welfare of homosexual couple's children show that they do BETTER than children of heterosexual couples! <br />The church has changed it's mind multiple times on multiple issues, not just blacks and the priesthood. and again who cares if the mormon church thinks it's cool or not, that's not the issue!<br />And look into the money and involvement the church had in Prop 8. I'd definitely call it more than a "reminder" of beliefs.Natashahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03610308226422485914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-21080941256528113762010-08-18T12:23:17.232-07:002010-08-18T12:23:17.232-07:00Yes finally the state of California is doing the r...Yes finally the state of California is doing the right thing. Voting is great and all but the country was set up to protect minorities from mob rule.<br />While there's no solid evidence on either side of the born or choose debate doesn't mean you can discriminate. And who are you to talk about sins of engaging in sexual behavior?<br />Schools aren't going to talk about butt sex but who cares if they do? I'm pretty sure most parents have the option of not having the school talk to their kids about sex and doing that themselves. They should be doing that anyway.<br />Um and what happened to separation of church and state? a gay couple can't sue the church for not marrying them. BESIDES the point that why would a gay couple want a bigoted MORMON bishop who thinks they are going to hell to marry them anyway? <br />So it's your responsibility to stop one sin, gay marriage? what about Word of Wisdom sins? want prohibition again?<br />I don't get what your thing about polygamy is considering the church still practices polygamy and the scripture requiring polygamy for exhalation is still in the D and C, seems like you should want legalized polygamy. The only reason the church stopped it was to comply with the laws of the United States. And seriously? brother and sister? are there brothers and sisters who want to be married? That's just as bad as the dog argument.<br />Murdering has a bad effect on communities and society- it involves KILLING PEOPLE?!?!?! really? we equate loving and carrying and protecting relationships to MURDER?! And they already are "sinning" nothing about a committed relationship between two homosexual people changes with a marriage license other than gaining the protections that a similar heterosexual relationship would have. Denying them a marriage doesn't change their lifestyle!<br />It's not requesting additional rights, it's about pursuit of happiness- a so called "inalienable right" "endowed by their maker"<br />Actually all studies done on the welfare of homosexual couple's children show that they do BETTER than children of heterosexual couples! <br />The church has changed it's mind multiple times on multiple issues, not just blacks and the priesthood. and again who cares if the mormon church thinks it's cool or not, that's not the issue!<br />And look into the money and involvement the church had in Prop 8. I'd definitely call it more than a "reminder" of beliefs.Natashahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03610308226422485914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-54366824682272984922010-08-18T12:20:09.715-07:002010-08-18T12:20:09.715-07:00"finally the state of CA is doing the right t..."finally the state of CA is doing the right thing"<br />Yes finally the state of California is doing the right thing. Voting is great and all but the country was set up to protect minorities from mob rule. This is what happened in California.<br />"I'm just happy that people born gay will be able to get married"<br />While there's no solid evidence on either side of the born or choose debate doesn't mean you can discriminate. And who are you to talk about sins of engaging in behavior. pfh. If a gay person did any of your NOTI scale they'd be in for a lot more than a talk with the bishop.<br />"as long as it doesn't affect me, let them do what they want"<br />Schools aren't going to talk about butt sex but who cares if they do? I'm pretty sure most parents have the option of not having the school talk to their kids about sex and doing that themselves. They should be doing that anyway.<br />"okay.... but other than that it doesn't affect me."<br />Um and what happened to separation of church and state? a gay couple can't sue the church for not marrying them. BESIDES the point that why would a gay couple want a bigoted MORMON bishop who thinks they are going to hell to marry them anyway? Seriously?<br />"gays being allowed to get married is inevitable. what's the point in trying to stop it?"<br />So it's your responsibility to stop one sin, gay marriage? what about Word of Wisdom sins? want prohibition again?<br />"I don't know why people are making such a big deal of this"<br />And I don't get what your thing about polygamy is considering the church still practices polygamy and the scripture requiring polygamy for exhalation is still in the D and C, seems like you should want legalized polygamy. The only reason the church stopped it was to comply with the laws of the United States. And seriously? brother and sister? are there brothers and sisters who want to be married? That's just as bad as the dog argument.<br />"but forcing gay people to live the same morals as we do..."<br />Murdering has a bad effect on communities and society- it involves KILLING PEOPLE?!?!?! really? we equate loving and carrying and protecting relationships to MURDER?! And they already are "sinning" nothing about a committed relationship between two homosexual people changes with a marriage license other than gaining the protections that a similar heterosexual relationship would have. Denying them a marriage doesn't change their lifestyle!<br />"it's taking away their right to marry a member of the opposite sex"<br />It's not requesting additional rights, it's about pursuit of happiness- a so called "inalienable right" "endowed by their maker"<br />So if they are never going to have that opportunity in the next life why do you give a shit if they have it now?<br />How do you know what "god" is going to allow or not allow?<br />"i think that gay couples deserve to be happy...."<br />Actually all studies done on the welfare of homosexual couple's children show that they do BETTER than children of heterosexual couples! omg! yah, it's true!<br />And the worst possible homo couple is still prepared and ready and willing and happy to have a child. Adoption is a long process. they don't give kids to anyone.<br />The church has changed it's mind multiple times on multiple issues, not just blacks and the priesthood. and again who cares if the mormon church thinks it's cool or not, that's not the issue!<br />The church leaders are old-fashioned hypocrites.<br />And look into the money and involvement the church had in Prop 8. I'd definitely call it more than a "reminder" of beliefs.Natashahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03610308226422485914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-71916517461840329802010-08-17T02:21:25.329-07:002010-08-17T02:21:25.329-07:00Sister Missionary,
"I'd be interested to...Sister Missionary,<br /><br />"I'd be interested to see the story of this Doctor that the courts are forcing to perform an ELECTIVE PROCEDURE. If it's true, then the DR. is an idiot because all he would have to do is refer the couple to another doctor or clinic. It happens all the time."<br /><br />The Court didn't force him to perform it, they said that if he was going to perform it, he had to be willing to perform it for same sex couples. He tried to refer them to another doctor, but that wasn't good enough for the same-sex couple. They were mad that he refused to perform the procedure for them on religious grounds, so they sued. The same thing will very likely happen if same sex marriage is permitted.<br /><br />I agree that it's difficult to change people's minds on this, but I don't believe that means we shouldn't express our opinion on the issue. And, I think there are some people who are undecided and want to hear both sides.<br /><br />As to your "whatever happens is God's will" argument, may I self-righteously point to Moroni and the Title of Liberty (oh yeah, I said it). Moroni didn't just take a back seat and say, "Well, if the Lord wants us to win, he'll destroy all the Lamanites for us." He took action and defended what was important. I think we have a responsibility to do the same.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-21717571938482164812010-08-16T22:47:38.932-07:002010-08-16T22:47:38.932-07:00This has been one of your better posts :)This has been one of your better posts :)Mormon Mystery Girlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05271132532440588272noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-63097007641560345192010-08-13T09:57:57.608-07:002010-08-13T09:57:57.608-07:00Really... in my opinion the fact that a gay judge ...Really... in my opinion the fact that a gay judge made a ruling on this is not a very good argument for anything. Just what exactly are you implying? The people who ruled against it were straight. And I'm pretty sure that first judge who was giving out licenses regardless of gender was straight. <br /><br />To you I say, "So what if he was gay?"Duckyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04784610135831029044noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-48765458835727354522010-08-12T22:06:08.326-07:002010-08-12T22:06:08.326-07:00I am a lesbian with a gift for satire and I am als...I am a lesbian with a gift for satire and I am also an attention whore.Nikkihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06506161645223765063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-3143523332898733652010-08-12T17:55:47.502-07:002010-08-12T17:55:47.502-07:00I think Nikki is actually a lesbian with a gift fo...I think Nikki is actually a lesbian with a gift for satire.<br /><br />Anon 2:17, you're sweet.<br /><br />Re: the idea that of course a gay judge would rule in favor of gay marriage, have you looked at the text of his ruling? I think perhaps the biggest difference is that a gay judge was willing to put in a lot more work compiling evidence than a straight one would have been.<br /><br />In fact, Calvin, if you read these, I'd be interested in seeing a follow up post in which you take on Walker's ruling point by point. It seems pretty unassailable to me, but I'm sure you can find a way.Matthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03156523925956642311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-50319050103496001772010-08-12T16:29:52.973-07:002010-08-12T16:29:52.973-07:00Calvin, you rock. Agreed :)Calvin, you rock. Agreed :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-91754666777939712172010-08-11T23:02:54.438-07:002010-08-11T23:02:54.438-07:00Anonymous 3:22-
I'd be interested to see the ...Anonymous 3:22-<br /><br />I'd be interested to see the story of this Doctor that the courts are forcing to perform an ELECTIVE PROCEDURE. If it's true, then the DR. is an idiot because all he would have to do is refer the couple to another doctor or clinic. It happens all the time.<br /><br />And Yes, I did also say that other thing, however the quote was taken out of context. First of all, I didn't argue either side of the point. Pro-Traditional Family/Pro-Family or whatever. I was merely pointing out that Nikki's use of the term "biologically reproducing challenged" applies to many more than homosexual couples, and therefore is not a good basis for arguing the point. <br /><br />I know it's sometimes hard to believe, but there are members of this church who don't really care what happens on this issue. I'm well aware that whatever happens is God's Will, so why should I care what other people can and can't do through worldly law? Would the decision going either way effect my future marriage either way? No. Could this turn the US into the next Sodom and Gomorrah? Possibly, but the world is going to end regardless. Arguing whether this issue is right or wrong is like arguing whether or not there is a God with an atheist, there's nothing you can say to change someones mind if they don't want to change it.Waited For a Sister Missionaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13572184650151693614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-21436781287547518232010-08-11T15:22:47.505-07:002010-08-11T15:22:47.505-07:00Sister Missionary,
You said:
"Having the ab...Sister Missionary,<br /><br />You said:<br /><br />"Having the ability to perform a marriage does not require you to do so."<br /><br />Well, this is part of the issue. A lesbian couple sued a doctor who refused to perform artificial insemination on one of them, which he'd refused to do for religious reasons. The California Supreme Court said that the doctor either had to start performing the procedure on lesbians, or stop it altogether. The real concern is that courts will take a similar approach with Mormon churches - either marry gay couples or we'll take away your right to perform any marriages.<br /><br />Also, you said:<br /><br />"What about the tens of thousands of STRAIGHT couples that adopt, or are incapable of reproduction in any way? What about those kids they adopt?"<br /><br />This argument deliberately misconstrues the pro-family position. Only a man and woman can naturally reproduce. Nature determined kids should have a mother and father, if possible. So, kids adopted by a male-female couple have a mother and father. Can you really support a family model that would purposefully deny children the right to a mother and father?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-87191729381944620762010-08-11T15:12:25.390-07:002010-08-11T15:12:25.390-07:00Waiting for a sister missionary, let's focus m...Waiting for a sister missionary, let's focus my argument was not emotional it was biological. 2 hetero's who are unable to have children are still male and female and last time I checked that was legal. So let's not confuse hetero couples and gay couples as the same like most who are for gay marriage do. They are not the same, they are different. It's like saying a man should be able to have a kid cuz he wants to and he is being discriminated against when he wants to take the pill. Swell, problem is, he doesn't have ovaries or a vagina or a uterus. <br />I never said gay people shouldn't be together, go ahead be together. I just said they shouldn't get married. I don't see anyone saying gay people should shack up and be happy about it. Hell I wish marriage were illegal for everyone then we could all just screw each other with no guilt. Stop trying to make an unnatural practice natural by invoking hetero reproductive inability as though it's the same thing. That is vomit in my mouth and stupid as F***.Nikkihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06506161645223765063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-90050236542176052902010-08-11T14:17:57.256-07:002010-08-11T14:17:57.256-07:00I'm really annoyed right now. Look at everyone...I'm really annoyed right now. Look at everyone. Stone throwing. So much stone throwing going on. You judge people harshly for their opinions on both sides. You know, shouldn't you just love people? I'm pretty sure that is what Christ would do. Talking about how people should leave the church or not be Mormon if they disagree with a policy. A POLICY. Not willing to even discuss or listen to their thoughts on it, or their struggles with it. Many of you just cast them to the wind and say, "well see ya," when you believe that this is The True Church. You want them to leave it for thinking differently before the policy was actually put in place. And many of them haven't even acted on their opinions. It's hard to change an opinion you've had all your life in a few months.<br /> Gay people that have gay tendencies and do not act on them are allowed to be in the church, hold positions, etc etc. How is it then that you call of these people who have an opinion about this stupid? And idiots? And wrong? Did they vote? Did they protest? You don't know, but if they don't live in California probably not. And yet, you treat their opinion like a more heinous sin than any other sin possible, when they have not even made an action. They have a thought. That's it.<br />Many people who join the church do so thinking that it isn't wrong to drink, and that it isn't wrong to smoke, and it isn't wrong to have sex out of wedlock. In fact some people think maybe it's kind of stupid. But many of those same people refrain from those ACTIONS because they love and believe in what the church has to offer. How is this any different? And who are any of you to judge and fault them for this? No one is perfect. No one is blameless. Everyone has faults. And the only person that gets to judge those and decide our worth based on them is God. <br /><br />I may not support gay marriage, but I know that pushing people away from the church is not going to do any good for it or us. Christ taught us to love everyone, and I just wish I saw more of that happening.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-75561854172440165772010-08-11T07:48:53.748-07:002010-08-11T07:48:53.748-07:00Nikki, you're dumb. Not because you disagree ...Nikki, you're dumb. Not because you disagree with the "fags and lezzies" getting married, but because you've let you emotional views on the subject cause you to make an obscene argument.<br /><br />Why use the if-they-can't-reproduce-they-shouldn't-be-together argument or the DNA argument, or the adoption argument? What about the tens of thousands of STRAIGHT couples that adopt, or are incapable of reproduction in any way? What about those kids they adopt? They also have the choice to find their genetic background. I guess we should just shut down LDS Family Services since adoption ruins kids' lives across the board.<br /><br />That was easily the most idiotic, ignorant, word-vomit of an argument I've ever heard against gay-marriage. If you really feel the need to argue the issue, do both sides a favor and try to sound like you actually thought for a second or two before you started typing.Waited For a Sister Missionaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13572184650151693614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-5212005174934728032010-08-10T20:19:24.253-07:002010-08-10T20:19:24.253-07:00LOVE that you wrote on this and nice job refuting ...LOVE that you wrote on this and nice job refuting the mental retardation. People leaving the church over this are losers and stuck in a politically defined world of victimology. Fine babies, leave and cry crocodile tears for the biologically reproducing challenged and watch them force the government and science to figure out a way for two dudes and two chicks to make a baby. <br />Not only does gay marriage create an entire generation of step child one biological parent families, it forces children selfishly created for these selfish unions to find their biological family tree. DNA matters folks and if you think this isn't the ending of a species then you are the product of sibling parents. In the world of science and not religion, when 2 dudes marry or hook up they are incapable of reproducing, result according to science, the end of a species. Extinction of a family. One of the biggies in marriage for religious folks is multiply and replenish the earth and this is a big area of no can do for fags and lezzies. It will however ensure that the government look at them as equals in adoption. Swell. But keep pushing this ridiculous practice jacked-up libtard Mormons and we will all be surrounded by kids raised by who the F*** knows. More traditional family down the crapper. So gay parents are loving, big fat deal. So were the penguins when they raised the penguin and he tried to kill batman. PEACE OUT.Nikkihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06506161645223765063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-80771858910813854172010-08-10T18:23:14.199-07:002010-08-10T18:23:14.199-07:00I was suprised which way you went on this issue, b...I was suprised which way you went on this issue, but completely agree.<br /><br />To all you who are saying he claims to love everyone than contradicted himself....just because you disagree with some one doesnt mean you hate them. Havent you ever disagreed with someone you hold in good light?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-35884756871502126522010-08-09T15:07:08.043-07:002010-08-09T15:07:08.043-07:00Wow. I'm actually getting converted back to t...Wow. I'm actually getting converted back to this blog. <br /><br />The only thing I would add is that it is not surprising that a GAY judge ruled in favor of GAY marriage. It's a joke Walker was even presiding at the trial.<br /><br />And I absolutely agree with your overall point. It's completely unsurprising that a lot of non-Mormons hate the Mormon Church for its pro-family position. But how you call yourself a Mormon but then turn around and hate the Church and fight against the Prophet is shocking...and ridiculous. If you want to be a Mormon, great. Be one. If not, well that's your choice too. But don't try to have it both ways.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3003719160930212557.post-49501201714871444102010-08-09T13:32:49.569-07:002010-08-09T13:32:49.569-07:00Just to re-quote myself: "any act that is spr...Just to re-quote myself: "any act that is spreading the cause of disease is affecting me. They don't just affect themselves, but the health care system as well." No where in my statement did I use words limiting the perimeters to sexual orientation. I did this on purpose. I believe any act whether hetero or homosexual that is spreading disease is irresponsible and shouldn't be encouraged.Janienoreply@blogger.com